Certificate
PROVA-20260418-BDC2
Issued
18 April 2026 at 15:10:07 UTC
✗INVALID
confidence
100/100
prova
v1.0.0
validator
v0.1.0
prompt
v1
Argument Graph
Drag nodes to explore. Hover for full claim text. Red nodes and edges indicate the failure location.
premiseclaimconclusion
Failure Diagnosis
type
CIRCULAR
location
A cycle exists among: The defendant's demographic group shows an elevated historical arrest rate in the training data, The recidivism risk tool assigns the defendant a high score, The sentencing judge imposes a 36-month custodial term rather than a 12-month term...
description
The reasoning contains a circular dependency: The defendant's demographic group shows an elevated historical arrest rate in the training data → The recidivism risk tool assigns the defendant a high score → The sentencing judge imposes a 36-month custodial term rather than a 12-month term → Extended incarceration disrupts employment and housing stability, the primary drivers of re-arrest in this demographic → Post-release re-arrests are recorded and used to recalculate the historical arrest rate used by the tool → The defendant's demographic group shows an elevated historical arrest rate in the training data. The argument uses its conclusion (directly or indirectly) as a premise in its own support chain. This is circular reasoning — the conclusion cannot be established because it is assumed in the process of establishing it.
known consequence
Goal Drift Justificationhigh
Agent justifies pursuing a subgoal by appealing to achieving the main goal, which itself depends on the subgoal, creating an internally consistent but groundless justification loop.
Original Reasoning Chain
Step 1: The recidivism risk tool assigns the defendant a high score because their demographic group shows an elevated historical arrest rate in the training data. Step 2: Because the defendant is classified high-risk, the sentencing judge imposes a 36-month custodial term rather than a 12-month term. Step 3: Research within the same system confirms that extended incarceration disrupts employment and housing stability, the primary drivers of re-arrest in this demographic. Step 4: Post-release re-arrests are recorded and used to recalculate the historical arrest rate that the tool uses in Step 1. Step 5: The elevated recidivism rate observed in Step 4 therefore validates the high-risk classification originally assigned in Step 1.
Independent Verification
certificate urlhttps://prova.cobound.dev/certificate/PROVA-20260418-BDC2
sha-256bdc2875716f4fee94203afe968ed5184cbccdeb96d6dfb81eced2716a537f340
Recompute the SHA-256 over timestamp + verdict + confidence_score + argument_graph + failure to verify this certificate has not been modified since issuance.
Scope of certification: This certificate verifies logical structure only. It does not verify factual accuracy, ethical appropriateness, regulatory compliance, or fitness for purpose. A structurally valid argument may still reach incorrect conclusions from false premises. A structurally invalid argument may accidentally reach a correct conclusion.